News-analysis example - Page 1
Our analyses of news texts are not censorship or a call for it.
We are mainly guided by logic and statements that are not presented in the right light in terms of distortion, that can incite people against each other and also make them sick.
That's why our website is aimed at all news channels. The ultimate goal in the transmission of information should be to work objectively and with truth, and not to promote diseases and discord. The texts shown here are taken from published news around the globe.
Identical texts that they have on the Internet are therefore probable, since many broadcasters are aligned or copy from the same sources. We do not name the news channels because we are neutral and we are exclusively concerned with the recovery of our species.
In addition, our veto is not limited to news, but to all texts, audio, and videos worldwide.

Louis Melloy

Quote

We are only see the truth, when we want to see.

1

BAD

dislike

GOOD

Like

The original Newstext from News source in European Union

Examples of how it would be correct, let's focus only on the last paragraph.

"Rafael van der Vaart, former Dutch international and TV pundit, makes a casual remark during the World Cup analysis: The Japanese players all look similar, perhaps that's why the defender didn't find the opponent assigned to him. He immediately adds: "That's a joke, of course. I hardly dare to say anything anyway." The reaction: accusations of racism, shitstorm and a subsequent forced apology.

If a Japanese commentator were to say that Europeans all look the same, there would probably be no outcry. Only when a "white man" says something that doesn't fit into the script is the moral cudgel swung."

Example 1: If a Japanese commentator were to say that Europeans all look the same, there would probably be no outcry. Only if someone in certain countries of the "EU" says something that does not fit into the script, the moral cudgel is swung.

Example 2: If a Japanese commentator were to say that Europeans all look the same, there would probably be no outcry from our country.

Example 3: If a commentator from outside the European Union were to say that Europeans all look the same, there would probably be no outcry. Only if someone in certain countries of the "EU" says something that does not fit into the script, the moral cudgel is swung.

Our veto for the reaction

Newstext-Analysis

Millions of people can look similar, even if they come from a hundred different countries. That is in the eye of the beholder. Such a statement does not entitle anyone else to judge it. Additional arguments: Leopards all look alike, although their fur is never 100% the same. The same goes for almost all species on our Planet and trees, flowers, leaves, stones, snowflakes...

• Japanese are not white, they have a different skin color than other humans.
• Japanese people have special rights, at least with such statements.
• Whoever wrote this text obviously lives the narrative of skin colors and thus serves the system.
• Such news texts bring discord into our world because they misuse skin color as a human classification. Divide et Impera. In addition, this text most likely fuels antipathy among Asians, at lease japanese people against the country or region from which this message comes.

Progress of health

2

BAD

dislike

GOOD

Like

The original Newstext from News source in European Union

Examples of how it would be correct, let's focus only on the headline.

The enemy begins to enter the city directly
In the Donbass, the situation is coming to a head dramatically: Russia is putting Kostyantynivka under massive pressure. Some commanders consider a loss of the city possible before autumn...

Example of how it would be correct, let's focus only on the headline. Neutral attitude and objective.
Example 1 (placeholder "Name of the country"):
"Name of the Country" begins to penetrate directly into the city.

Our veto for the reaction

Newstext-Analysis

Not applicable

Misrepresentations in this message:

• The Headline: The Enemy Begins to Invade the City Directly 

A news channel that publishes this headline causes fear in the reader, which is not good for his personal or physical health. These words suggest to the reader that the enemy, whoever that is supposed to be, has invaded his own country. The headline also shows how the writer of this news has already been influenced by the propaganda of his own country. The question of checking the news via the newsroom before it goes online is also more than justified. With such texts, the news channel takes sides in the conflict by calling a country an enemy. This cannot be in the interest of the country and its citizens in which the News-Channel is located.
Progress of health